M&A: Earn-out vs. Performance Guarantee

Linkedin Post

I find that clients and other advisers sometimes confuse the concepts of an earn-out with a performance guarantee. They tell me they want a performance guarantee clause in the sale and purchase agreement, but upon further probing, it becomes clear that what they actually want is an earn-out clause.

Both earn-out and performance guarantee are common mechanisms used in the context of M&A to bridge gaps in valuation and mitigate risks associated with the deal. However, they are distinct concepts.

๐„๐š๐ซ๐ง-๐Ž๐ฎ๐ญ

An earn-out is a contingent payment arrangement in an M&A deal where a portion of the purchase price is based on the future performance of the target company. The purchaser will pay the seller additional payments, known as the earn-out, if the target company meets the performance metrics or milestones after the acquisition, as agreed between the purchaser and seller.

Earn-outs are usually linked to financial or operational targets, such as profits, revenue, or customer retention.

Earn-outs are structured over a defined period, usually 1 to 3 years in my experience.

If the target company does not meet the predefined performance metrics or milestones during the earn-out period, the seller will not receive the additional payments.

๐๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐†๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž

A performance guarantee is an assurance given by the seller to ensure that the target company achieves a specific performance level after the acquisition, as agreed between the seller and purchaser.

Performance guarantees may also be tied to financial or operational targets, but unlike earn-outs, performance guarantees are not contingent payments.

If the target company fails to meet the performance metrics or milestones during the period as agreed between the seller and purchaser, the purchaser will have recourse against the seller, which may include financial compensation or other remedies as specified in the agreement.

malaysiancorporatelawyer
mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 26 October 2023.

Linkedin Post
Conversation on W&I Insurance in M&A Transactions

As an M&A lawyer with a keen interest in the nuances of the M&A field, Iโ€™ve observed that warranty and indemnity insurance (W&I) is not that common in M&A transactions in Malaysia, as far as I know. Therefore, when I saw Martijn de Lange of BMS Group commenting about W&I …

Company Law
Indirect Substantial Shareholder

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company. One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a …

Company Law
Legal Requirements for Directors’ Fees and Benefits in Malaysia

One common issue I encounter in both M&A deals and IPO exercises relates to compliance with the legal requirements for the payment of directorโ€™s fees and benefits. Additionally, the legal obligations regarding directorโ€™s service contracts should not be overlooked. Here are the key points: Constitution 1.ย If a company, whether public …