Can you distinguish between a good lawyer and a mediocre lawyer?

Lawyering

I have heard it many times… that most clients are unable to distinguish between a mediocre lawyer and a good one.

Is that true?

Can’t a client tell when a lawyer is well-prepared, having reviewed all the documents and anticipating potential questions, versus one who might not be as ready for the meeting?

Can’t a client appreciate the difference between a lawyer who takes the time to thoroughly brief the client and ensure the client understands what’s at stake, versus one who may not invest as much time in that process?

And what about the attention to detail in documents? Can’t a client see the difference between an agreement that’s carefully drafted and one that might leave room for ambiguity or future disputes?

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 11 March 2025.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …