Deconstructing M&A Agreement

Linkedin Post

When I review a draft sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction, here’s how I would break down the key items that need to be addressed in the agreement:

1. Before fulfilment of conditions precedent

  • What are the conditions precedent?
  • Who is responsible for fulfilling the conditions precedent?
  • When must the conditions precedent be fulfilled?
  • When will the condition period expire?
  • What are the rights and liabilities of the parties if the conditions precedent are not fulfilled?

2. After fulfilment of conditions precedent up to completion

  • What are the restrictions on the target company and seller during the period after the fulfilment of the conditions precedent up to completion?

From the seller’s perspective, the restrictions should not be so stringent that they affect the business and operations of the target company.

From the buyer’s perspective, the buyer seeks assurance that the target company at completion of the acquisition is substantially the same company (operationally and financially) that the buyer intends to buy when signing the agreement.

  • What are the events that may give rise to termination during this period?
  • What are the rights and liabilities of the parties if the agreement is not completed after fulfilment of conditions precedent?

3. Completion

  • When will completion take place?
  • What steps need to be taken for the completion of the sale and purchase?

4. Post completion

  • What are the parties’ obligations post-completion?

Think about notifications to banks regarding the change of guarantor for facilities granted to the target company, earn-outs, and rectifications of issues discovered during due diligence that are not serious enough to disrupt the transaction but still need to be addressed

  • When must the post-completion obligations be fulfilled?

It helps me think systematically, particularly when a draft is not well-structured, and I have to figure out what the counterparty is asking in the draft.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 8 March 2025.

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysia’s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions don’t always mean “no entry” for investors in Malaysia. If you’re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.    The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholders’ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholders’ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …