M&A: Earn-out vs. Performance Guarantee

Linkedin Post

I find that clients and other advisers sometimes confuse the concepts of an earn-out with a performance guarantee. They tell me they want a performance guarantee clause in the sale and purchase agreement, but upon further probing, it becomes clear that what they actually want is an earn-out clause.

Both earn-out and performance guarantee are common mechanisms used in the context of M&A to bridge gaps in valuation and mitigate risks associated with the deal. However, they are distinct concepts.

๐„๐š๐ซ๐ง-๐Ž๐ฎ๐ญ

An earn-out is a contingent payment arrangement in an M&A deal where a portion of the purchase price is based on the future performance of the target company. The purchaser will pay the seller additional payments, known as the earn-out, if the target company meets the performance metrics or milestones after the acquisition, as agreed between the purchaser and seller.

Earn-outs are usually linked to financial or operational targets, such as profits, revenue, or customer retention.

Earn-outs are structured over a defined period, usually 1 to 3 years in my experience.

If the target company does not meet the predefined performance metrics or milestones during the earn-out period, the seller will not receive the additional payments.

๐๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐†๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž

A performance guarantee is an assurance given by the seller to ensure that the target company achieves a specific performance level after the acquisition, as agreed between the seller and purchaser.

Performance guarantees may also be tied to financial or operational targets, but unlike earn-outs, performance guarantees are not contingent payments.

If the target company fails to meet the performance metrics or milestones during the period as agreed between the seller and purchaser, the purchaser will have recourse against the seller, which may include financial compensation or other remedies as specified in the agreement.

malaysiancorporatelawyer
mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 26 October 2023.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to sellerโ€™s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (โ€œSPAโ€). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellersโ€™ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellersโ€™ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clientsโ€™ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …