A Director Cannot be Absolved from Responsibilities by Appointing an Alternate Director

Company Law

Reviewing constitution (usually in the context of a corporate transaction) is part of my job as a corporate lawyer. It’s not always fun but it’s always a good refresher of the Companies Act 2016.

While reviewing the constitution of a company, I came across the following provision which made me stop and check the Companies Act 2016.

“A Director shall not be liable for the acts and defaults of any alternate Director appointed by him.”

The above is inconsistent with section 216(2) of the Companies Act 2016 which provides that where the directors have delegated any power, the directors are responsible for the exercise of the power by the delegatee as if the power had been exercised by the directors themselves.

There is exception to section 216(2) of the Companies Act which is based on the directors having reasonable grounds to believe otherwise.

In short, the constitution of a company cannot generally absolve a director from its responsibilities as a director by appointing an alternate director.

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 22 June 2023.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …