A Director Cannot be Absolved from Responsibilities by Appointing an Alternate Director

Company Law

Reviewing constitution (usually in the context of a corporate transaction) is part of my job as a corporate lawyer. It’s not always fun but it’s always a good refresher of the Companies Act 2016.

While reviewing the constitution of a company, I came across the following provision which made me stop and check the Companies Act 2016.

“A Director shall not be liable for the acts and defaults of any alternate Director appointed by him.”

The above is inconsistent with section 216(2) of the Companies Act 2016 which provides that where the directors have delegated any power, the directors are responsible for the exercise of the power by the delegatee as if the power had been exercised by the directors themselves.

There is exception to section 216(2) of the Companies Act which is based on the directors having reasonable grounds to believe otherwise.

In short, the constitution of a company cannot generally absolve a director from its responsibilities as a director by appointing an alternate director.

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 22 June 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …