Begin with the end in mind: Post-completion integration

Linkedin Post

I once worked on an M&A deal that took more than a year to complete. While the deal was not inherently complex, it dragged on due to delays in finalizing the details of the transaction agreements for reason beyond my control.

As the deal involved a larger corporation acquiring a stake in a smaller company, there was post-completion integration involved.

The negotiations on various aspects of the deal were protracted primarily because greenlight from various departments within the corporate buyer was required. Although the parties brought up post-completion integration several times during negotiation, the details were not forthcoming. When the parties finally delved into cost allocation and other post-integration details, they realized their expectations were far from aligned. It took a few more months to resolve these issues and finally agree on the provisions in relation to post-completion integration.

In an M&A transaction, it is worth considering post-completion integration early in the process. Some key considerations include:

1.      Will the seller provide transitional services to the target such as HR, payroll, or IT services, until the target is fully integrated into the buyer’s operation?

2.      Alternatively, will the buyer provide shared services to the target, for efficiency and to align the operation of the target with the buyer and its group of companies?

3.      What will be the costs involved and how will the costs be allocated between the parties?

4.      Do the parties need separate agreements to govern transitional or shared services? Some parties include the agreed form of such agreements into the main sale and purchase agreement to lock in the terms.

5.      If the target is charged for the shared services, how will this affect its profitability and any earnout provisions for the seller?

Considering these aspects early on can save time and ensure a smoother transition for the parties and target.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 21 September 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …