Be clear with timeline in M&A SPA

Drafting

Today’s post is on interpretation of time in a sale and purchase agreement for M&A transaction.

Consider the following clause:

“The Seller shall fulfil the Conditions Precedent no later than 90 days from the date of this Agreement.”

Questions for you to consider:

1. Do the 90 days stated in the clause above commence on the date of the agreement or the day after?

2. If the last day of the 90 days’ period fall on a non-working day where the parties are located (typically defined as “Business Day” in SPA), what is the implication?

To avoid any ambiguity as to when a timeline starts or stops in a sale and purchase agreement, it would be wise to include clear interpretation clauses in the agreement to address the questions above.

Example:
Where an act is required to be done within a specified number of days after or from a specified date, the period is exclusive of the date so specified and if any period of time falls on a day which is not a Business Day, then that period is deemed to only expire on the next Business Day.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions
#contractdrafting

First posted on Linkedin on 3 December 2021.

Linkedin Post
Earn-Out: A Postponed Dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The Disclosure Letter: Why Founders Selling Their Companies Should Not Treat It as an Afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-Party Consents in a Share Sale: What Sellers Should Check Before Negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …