Begin with the end in mind: Post-completion integration

Linkedin Post

I once worked on an M&A deal that took more than a year to complete. While the deal was not inherently complex, it dragged on due to delays in finalizing the details of the transaction agreements for reason beyond my control.

As the deal involved a larger corporation acquiring a stake in a smaller company, there was post-completion integration involved.

The negotiations on various aspects of the deal were protracted primarily because greenlight from various departments within the corporate buyer was required. Although the parties brought up post-completion integration several times during negotiation, the details were not forthcoming. When the parties finally delved into cost allocation and other post-integration details, they realized their expectations were far from aligned. It took a few more months to resolve these issues and finally agree on the provisions in relation to post-completion integration.

In an M&A transaction, it is worth considering post-completion integration early in the process. Some key considerations include:

1.      Will the seller provide transitional services to the target such as HR, payroll, or IT services, until the target is fully integrated into the buyer’s operation?

2.      Alternatively, will the buyer provide shared services to the target, for efficiency and to align the operation of the target with the buyer and its group of companies?

3.      What will be the costs involved and how will the costs be allocated between the parties?

4.      Do the parties need separate agreements to govern transitional or shared services? Some parties include the agreed form of such agreements into the main sale and purchase agreement to lock in the terms.

5.      If the target is charged for the shared services, how will this affect its profitability and any earnout provisions for the seller?

Considering these aspects early on can save time and ensure a smoother transition for the parties and target.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 21 September 2023.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …