Behind the deal: Acquisition of pawnbroking companies

Linkedin Post

We advised a listed group in Singapore on its acquisition of a majority stake in pawnbroking companies in Malaysia.

The following are three takeaways that I find interesting from the transaction:

1. Increased sophistication

The traditional perception of pawnbroking business as small-scale operations has significantly shifted towards increased sophistication. An example is the introduction of drive-through pawnshops in Malaysia since 2017, indicative of convenient and innovative service offerings.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that established jewellery companies are venturing into the pawnbroking industry by acquiring stakes in or entering into joint ventures with pawnbroking companies to complement their existing jewellery business.

2. Numerous shareholders

The pawnbroking business is relatively capital-intensive. Unlike typical private companies, which usually have a single-digit number of shareholders, pawnbroking companies may have a larger pool of shareholders.

It is important to identify the key shareholders representing the sellers during negotiations, as understanding their influence on the decision-making process impacts the negotiation dynamics.

3. Atomic energy licence

 In addition to the pawnbroker licence, a licence may be required under the Atomic Energy Licensing Act 1984 of Malaysia to carry out pawnbroking business. Despite the name implying nuclear-related activities, this legislation provides that a licence is required to purchase, own, possess, use, handle, or store irradiating apparatus. Pawnshops commonly use irradiating apparatus in the form of X-ray gold testing machine.

One aspect of M&A which I find interesting is that it provides me with insights into the industries of the target companies, extending beyond mere legal knowledge.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 23 November 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …