Can PLS vary a corporate proposal which has been approved by shareholders?

Equity capital markets (ECM)

A client may change its mind at the last minute.

Shareholders’ and regulators’ approvals are required for certain corporate proposals by a public company listed on Bursa Malaysia (“𝗣𝗟𝗖”).

After all the required approvals have been obtained, the PLC may ask:

“Can we do it this way instead?”

Sometimes the client may want to utilise the proceeds raised from a corporate exercise differently from what is set out in prospectus or circular after shareholders’ approval for the corporate exercise has been obtained.

Under the Listing Requirements, the PLC must issue a circular to its shareholders and seek its shareholders’ approval if it proposes to make a material change to the utilisation of proceeds raised by the PLC from its IPO or new issue of securities which has been approved by way of specific shareholder approval.

A change to the utilisation of proceeds is considered material if such change is 25% or more of the total proceeds raised.

It is not uncommon for PLCs to go back to their shareholders to seek their approval to vary the utilisation of proceeds for corporate exercises which have been approved by their shareholders.

The Listing Requirements also require a PLC to issue a circular to its shareholders and seek its shareholders’ approval if it proposes to make a material amendment, modification or variation to a proposal which has been approved by shareholders in general meeting.

An amendment, modification or variation is considered material if it can be reasonably expected to have a material effect on the decision of a holder of securities of the PLC in relation to such proposal.

Short answer to the question in the header- yes but shareholders’ approval is required if the variation is material.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#equitycapitalmarkets
#listingrequirements

This post was originally posted on Linkedin on 16 February 2022. Follow me on Linkedin.

Linkedin Post
M&A Specialist and Generalist

I didn’t fully appreciate how specialised and broad M&A practice is until I found myself thinking about how various legal issues discussed in the articles I read apply to M&A transactions. While reading an article on whether consideration is required for the variation of contracts, I was reminded of a …

Linkedin Post
Exclusivity when negotiating an M&A deal

If you are a buyer negotiating to acquire business or shares of a company, you would want to ensure that you do not incur costs during the negotiation only for the seller to end the negotiation and sell to another party. A buyer would want to ensure that the seller …

Linkedin Post
Material Adverse Effect (“MAE”) Clause in M&A Transactions

I came across the following definition of “MAE” from the American Bar Association’s Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Point Study: “MAE” means any result, occurrence, fact, change, event, or effect that has, or could reasonably be expected to have, a materially adverse effect on the business, assets, liabilities, capitalization, condition …