Can the Purchaser Rely on the Warranty and Indemnity Clauses in the Share Purchase Agreement?

Linkedin Post

In M&A transactions, warranty and indemnity clauses are toolkits for protecting the purchaser’s interest. But what happens if the seller can’t fulfill these obligations due to financial reason? A well-drafted clause is only as effective as the seller’s ability to pay.

If the purchaser is concerned that the seller may not have the financial means to satisfy claims brought under any warranty or indemnity clauses, the purchaser may consider the following:

1. Guarantee from holding company/shareholder

If the seller is a company, the purchaser may request for a guarantee from the seller’s shareholders, which may be a holding company or individuals.

2. Retention in escrow account

The parties may agree for a portion of the purchase price to be retained in an escrow account for an agreed period to satisfy any warranty or indemnity claims that may arise. The amount in the escrow account would be paid to the seller at the end of the agreed period if no claim is made by the purchaser.

3. Deferred payment

The parties may agree for the purchaser to pay the bulk of the purchase price on completion of the share purchase agreement. The purchaser will then pay the remaining part of the purchase price post completion. The purchaser will make the deferred payment to the seller at the end of the agreed period during which the purchaser may claim under the warranty or indemnity clauses.

4. Bank guarantee

The purchaser may request that the seller provide a bank guarantee to guarantee the seller’s performance in the event of warranty or indemnity claims. However, the seller may be reluctant to do so as there is cost involved in providing a bank guarantee.

Whether the seller would agree to any of the above would depend partly on the parties’ bargaining power. The seller may also be concerned that the purchaser put forward claims without merit to try to set off the purchase price against the warranty or indemnity claims, if the SPA allows for setting off.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 21 January 2025.

Linkedin Post
Plan the exit before investing as a shareholder

When investing in a company, whether as a founder, co-founder, or strategic investor, most people focus on the business plan, the valuation and the growth potential. One question that is often overlooked: How can a shareholder exit this company, and under what terms?  Share transfers and shareholder exits often happen …

Linkedin Post
Structuring shareholding in companies

Structuring shareholding affects shareholders’ control, rights and exit. The type of shares issued determines: · Who makes decisions · Who gets paid (and when) · Who gets what rights Below is a concise overview of two type of shares and how they serve different purposes: Ordinary Shares The most commonly issued type of …

Linkedin Post
Getting into the details to make a deal work

A big part of my role as a corporate lawyer has been listening to clients explain the commercial terms they want in their deals. The next step is asking the right questions that make those terms work in the real world. Sometimes the parties have a general idea of the …