Can the Purchaser Rely on the Warranty and Indemnity Clauses in the Share Purchase Agreement?

Linkedin Post

In M&A transactions, warranty and indemnity clauses are toolkits for protecting the purchaser’s interest. But what happens if the seller can’t fulfill these obligations due to financial reason? A well-drafted clause is only as effective as the seller’s ability to pay.

If the purchaser is concerned that the seller may not have the financial means to satisfy claims brought under any warranty or indemnity clauses, the purchaser may consider the following:

1. Guarantee from holding company/shareholder

If the seller is a company, the purchaser may request for a guarantee from the seller’s shareholders, which may be a holding company or individuals.

2. Retention in escrow account

The parties may agree for a portion of the purchase price to be retained in an escrow account for an agreed period to satisfy any warranty or indemnity claims that may arise. The amount in the escrow account would be paid to the seller at the end of the agreed period if no claim is made by the purchaser.

3. Deferred payment

The parties may agree for the purchaser to pay the bulk of the purchase price on completion of the share purchase agreement. The purchaser will then pay the remaining part of the purchase price post completion. The purchaser will make the deferred payment to the seller at the end of the agreed period during which the purchaser may claim under the warranty or indemnity clauses.

4. Bank guarantee

The purchaser may request that the seller provide a bank guarantee to guarantee the seller’s performance in the event of warranty or indemnity claims. However, the seller may be reluctant to do so as there is cost involved in providing a bank guarantee.

Whether the seller would agree to any of the above would depend partly on the parties’ bargaining power. The seller may also be concerned that the purchaser put forward claims without merit to try to set off the purchase price against the warranty or indemnity claims, if the SPA allows for setting off.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 21 January 2025.

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysia’s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions don’t always mean “no entry” for investors in Malaysia. If you’re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.    The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholders’ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholders’ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …