CEO, CFO, COO are also “directors”

The definition of a “director” is not limited to a person who is formally appointed as a director.

Whether a person is a director depends more on the person’s functions than title.

The definition of a “director” under section 2 of the Companies Act 2016 is not exhaustive. It includes a person in accordance with whose directors or instructions the majority of directors of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director.

In respect of certain directors’ duties and responsibilities under the CA 2016, section 210 widens the definition of “director” to include CEO, CFO, COO or any other person primarily responsible for the management of a company. This means they would also be liable for their breach of directors’ duties and responsibilities under the CA 2016 where the definition of “director” includes them.

For example, under section 213, CEO, CFO, COO or persons primarily responsible for the management of a company must exercise their powers for proper purpose and in good faith in the company’s best interest. The business judgement rule in section 214 applies to them and they are responsible for actions of delegatee pursuant to section 216.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#directorsduties
#directorsliabilities

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 27 April 2021.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …