Consistency in drafting

Consistency.

Consistency matters a lot when drafting agreements.

I was half amused and half exasperated when I saw an amended draft shareholders’ agreement which stated that shareholders may exercise certain rights by giving notice to the other shareholders. The next clause stated that the shareholders shall give notice to the board who will then give notice to the other shareholders to exercise the rights.

Inconsistency usually arises when drafts are amended multiple times and the drafter does not realise the newly amended Clause 5 in the sixth draft is inconsistent with Clause 6 which has been there since the first draft.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions
#shareholdersagreement

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 5 November 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …