Directors’ independence

Directorsโ€™ independence has been a key focus of the Securities Commission Malaysia (โ€œ๐—ฆ๐—–โ€) and Bursa Malaysia Securitiesย Berhadย (โ€œ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎโ€) lately as can be seen from the following amendments or proposed amendments:

๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ (โ€œ๐— ๐—–๐—–๐—šโ€)
The SC issued the revised MCCG on 28 April 2021 which took effect on the same day. The revisions in relation to directorsโ€™ independence include:

1. recommending that ifย the board intends to retain an independent director (“ID”) after 9 years, the board should provide justification and seek annual shareholdersโ€™ approval via a 2-tier voting process (previously required after 12 years);

2. discouraging a listed issuer from appointing active politicians as directors;

3. recommending that board committee meeting to be conducted separately from board meeting to enable objective and independent discussion; and

4. recommending that the Audit Committee of a listed company to have a policy that requires aย former partner of the external audit firm of the listed company to observe a cooling-off period of at least 3 years before being appointed as an Audit Committee member. This applies to all former partners of the audit firm and affiliate firm (including those providing advisory services, tax consulting etc). Previously, the cooling-off period of at least 2 years applied to former key audit partner.

๐—”๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ (โ€œ๐—Ÿ๐—ฅโ€)
Bursa enhanced the requirements and eligibility of ID in the LR by:

1.ย lengtheningย the cooling-off period from 2 years to 3 years for:
(i) an officer;
(ii) an adviser; or
(iii) a transacting party of prescribed transactions,
of an applicant, listed issuer or any related corporation of the applicant or listed issuer; and

2. extending 3 years cooling-off period to a non-independent non-executive director.

The amendments have been in effect since 1 October 2020.

๐—•๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฅ
Bursa has issued a consultation paper on 21 July 2021 to seek public feedback by 1 September 2021 on, amongst others, the following proposed amendments to the LR in relation to directorsโ€™ independence:

1. amendment to the definition ofย โ€œindependent directorโ€ under the LR by specifying that an ID is one who has not served as an ID of an applicant, listed issuer or any related corporation of the applicant or listed issuer for a cumulative period of more than 12 years from the date of his first appointment as an ID; and

2. requiring a ID who has served for a cumulative 12 years to observe a cooling-off period of 3 years before he or she may be reappointed as an ID. The appointment is still subject to satisfaction of all the criteria on independence as set out in the LR as well as shareholdersโ€™ scrutiny and approval.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#directors
#corporategovernance

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysiaโ€™s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions donโ€™t always mean โ€œno entryโ€ for investors in Malaysia. If youโ€™re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.ย ย ย ย The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholdersโ€™ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholdersโ€™ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …