Due Diligence: What Are Salient Terms?

Due Diligence

In corporate transactions, junior lawyers are often tasked with reviewing contracts and summarising salient terms for inclusion in legal due diligence reports.

For those new to legal due diligence, a frequently asked question is, “What do you mean by salient terms?”.

Generally, salient terms include information that investors need to make informed decisions about their investments, as well as terms that affect the transactions.

In M&A transactions, salient terms include details related to:

  • date, parties, nature/purpose of the contracts
  • consideration and mode of payment
  • duration of contracts
  • changes in shareholding, control, management, or directors of the target company
  • obligations imposed on the target company, such as outstanding warranties and indemnities
  • unfavourable termination clauses in contracts with customers/suppliers
  • unusual or onerous clauses

Summarise the salient terms without changing their meaning. Don’t copy verbatim into the report.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 18 January 2024.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …