Duty of nominee director to act in the best interest of company prevails

Company Law

A director may be appointed to represent the interests of a person or a particular group such as employees, creditors or debenture holders.

When a shareholder invests in a company, the shareholder and the company may agree that the shareholder has the right to appoint a director to represent the shareholder’s interest in the company.

Such director is known as a nominee director.

Although a nominee director is appointed to represent the interest of his nominator, the nominee director must act in the best interest of the company. In the event of any conflict between his duty to act in the best interest of the company and his duty to his nominator, the duty to act in the best interest of the company prevails. This is provided under section 217 of the Companies Act 2016.

A director who contravenes this duty commits an offence under the Companies Act 2016 and on conviction, is liable to imprisonment or a fine or both.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#directorsduties
#nomineedirector
#companiesact2016

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 15 April 2021.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …