Duty of nominee director to act in the best interest of company prevails

Company Law

A director may be appointed to represent the interests of a person or a particular group such as employees, creditors or debenture holders.

When a shareholder invests in a company, the shareholder and the company may agree that the shareholder has the right to appoint a director to represent the shareholder’s interest in the company.

Such director is known as a nominee director.

Although a nominee director is appointed to represent the interest of his nominator, the nominee director must act in the best interest of the company. In the event of any conflict between his duty to act in the best interest of the company and his duty to his nominator, the duty to act in the best interest of the company prevails. This is provided under section 217 of the Companies Act 2016.

A director who contravenes this duty commits an offence under the Companies Act 2016 and on conviction, is liable to imprisonment or a fine or both.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#directorsduties
#nomineedirector
#companiesact2016

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 15 April 2021.

Linkedin Post
Earn-Out: A Postponed Dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The Disclosure Letter: Why Founders Selling Their Companies Should Not Treat It as an Afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-Party Consents in a Share Sale: What Sellers Should Check Before Negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …