Exclusivity in M&A negotiation

Linkedin Post

Today’s post is on exclusivity when negotiating an M&A deal.

If you are a buyer entering into a negotiation to acquire business or shares of a company, you would want to ensure that you do not incur costs during the negotiation only for the seller to end the negotiation and sell to another party.

A buyer would want to ensure that the seller is not using the buyer to attract higher offers.

Therefore, the buyer would usually want to have an exclusivity clause in a term sheet or heads of agreement (HoA) whereby the seller undertakes not to enter into negotiations with other parties for the sale in question and the buyer may negotiate exclusively with the seller during an agreed period.

If other terms in the term sheet or HoA are meant to be non-binding, it is important to specifically state that the exclusivity clause is binding. The parties should also specify clearly when the exclusivity period will end.

From the seller’s perspective, the seller would want the exclusivity period to be as short as possible so that the seller is not restricted if there are other potential buyers.

In short:
1. Have an exclusivity clause in term sheet or HoA.
2. State that the exclusivity clause is binding if other terms are non-binding.
3. Specify when the exclusivity period will end.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 5 January 2022.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …