Exclusivity period

Parties in M&A transactions may sometimes enter into heads of agreement to set out the key terms and conditions on how they intend the transactions to proceed, prior to the negotiation and execution of sale and purchase agreements.

The buyer should request the heads of agreement to include an exclusivity clause.  Under such clause, the seller agrees to negotiate solely with the buyer, and not to enter into any negotiation or transaction with any other party to dispose the target company or assets, for an agreed period of time. This allows the buyer time to carry out due diligence and to negotiate the terms of the transaction without having to worry that the seller is using the buyer to get offers from other parties.

From the seller’s perspective, the seller would want the exclusivity period to be as short as possible or not longer than necessary for the buyer to conduct the required due diligence. This is to encourage the buyer to proceed with the transaction as soon as possible.

After the exclusivity period expires, the seller may enter into discussion with other parties, even if the negotiation with the original buyer is still ongoing, unless the exclusivity period is extended.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 7 February 2021.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …