Exclusivity period in M&A

Linkedin Post

In the M&A context, an exclusivity period means that for a certain period of time, the seller agrees to negotiate only with one potential buyer.

From the buyer’s perspective, it is beneficial to have a longer exclusivity period for the following reasons:

1. A longer exclusivity period gives the buyer more time to conduct due diligence on the target company. This helps the buyer gain a better understanding of the company and identify any potential risks or issues.

2. The seller is restricted from entertaining offers from other potential buyers during the extended period. This reduces competition and increases the buyer’s chances of securing the deal.

3. The buyer can gather information through the due diligence process and engage with the senior management of the target company. This allows the buyer to refine its offer and negotiate from a better position.

4. With exclusivity, the buyer doesn’t need to worry that the seller is using the buyer as a leverage to attract better offers from other parties.

From the seller’s perspective, it is better to have a shorter exclusivity period for the following reasons:

1. A shorter exclusivity period encourages the buyer to proceed with the deal expeditiously.

2. A longer exclusivity period means that the seller may lose the opportunity to sell the business to other potential buyer who may offer better terms.

3. A longer exclusivity period prolongs the overall process of closing the deal.

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 29 June 2023.

Linkedin Post
Conversation on W&I Insurance in M&A Transactions

As an M&A lawyer with a keen interest in the nuances of the M&A field, I’ve observed that warranty and indemnity insurance (W&I) is not that common in M&A transactions in Malaysia, as far as I know. Therefore, when I saw Martijn de Lange of BMS Group commenting about W&I …

Company Law
Indirect Substantial Shareholder

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company. One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a …

Company Law
Legal Requirements for Directors’ Fees and Benefits in Malaysia

One common issue I encounter in both M&A deals and IPO exercises relates to compliance with the legal requirements for the payment of director’s fees and benefits. Additionally, the legal obligations regarding director’s service contracts should not be overlooked. Here are the key points: Constitution 1. If a company, whether public …