Frequently encountered issues in IPO

IPO

Are there CCC or CF for all properties occupied by the Group?

It is an offence under section 70(27) of the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 (“Act”) for any person to occupy or permit to be occupied any building or part thereof without a certificate of completion and compliance (“CCC”). This provision has a wide effect as it may cover owners, occupiers, tenants and purchasers of buildings. The CCC must be issued by a qualified person who submits building plans to the local authority for approval in accordance with the Act or any by-laws made under the Act.

On conviction, the offender is liable to a fine not exceeding RM250,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to both.

Prior to the Street, Drainage and Building (Amendment) Act 2007 which came into force on 12 April 2007, the equivalent of CCC was the certificate of fitness of occupation (“CF”) issued by the local authority under the Uniform By-Laws of the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974.

A company which intends to undertake an IPO should ensure that there are proper CCCs or CFs for all the properties occupied by the Group, whether the properties are owned or rented by the Group to avoid delay to the IPO process.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#IPO

#howtoIPO

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 5 March 2021.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …