Frequently referred to provisions in Companies Act for corporate transactions

Company Law

When I tell people that I’m a lawyer, they often respond with, “Oh, you must have a good memory. That’s so much to memorise.”

I believe it’s more important to understand and apply the law rather than memorise it. After all, you can always refer to online resources or statute books to find the relevant legislation.

As a corporate lawyer, there are a few sections in the Companies Act 2016 that I frequently refer to when working on transactions or corporate exercises:

When a transaction involves issuance of shares

  • Section 75 on directors’ powers to allot shares with prior approval of shareholders
  • Section 76 on allotment of shares with shareholders’ approval

When directors are interested in a transaction

  • Section 221 on disclosure of directors’ interest in contracts.

This provision should be considered when reviewing directors’ resolutions where there are directors interested in the contracts to be entered by the company.

  • Section 222 on restriction on a director of a company who is interested in a contract to be entered by the company from voting on the contract and exceptions to the restriction.

Shareholders’ approval required for certain transactions

  • Section 223 on shareholders’ approval required for (a)the acquisition by a company of an undertaking or property of a substantial value; or (b) the disposal of a substantial portion of the company’s undertaking or property.
  • Section 228 on shareholders’ approval required for “related party transactions”.

Understanding these key provisions in the Companies Act 2016 and knowing when to refer to them is essential for providing accurate and effective legal advice.

#MalaysianCorporateLawyer

This post first posted on LinkedIn on 6 July 2024.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …