How buyers could secure claims in M&A transactions

Linkedin Post

Today’s post is on how a buyer may “secure” warranty and indemnity claims in M&A transactions.

If the buyer is unable to recover damages from the seller for any warranty or indemnity claim due to the seller’s financial position, well-drafted clauses would not be much use to the buyer.

If the buyer is concerned that the seller may not have the financial means to pay for claims brought by the buyer under any warranty or indemnity clauses, the buyer may consider the following:

1. Guarantee from holding company/shareholder

Where the seller is a company, the buyer may request for a guarantee from the seller’s shareholders, who may be a holding company or individuals.

2. Retention

The parties may agree for a portion of the purchase price to be retained in an escrow account for an agreed period to satisfy any warranty or indemnity claims which may arise during that period. The escrow account may be in the joint names of the seller’s solicitors and buyer’s solicitors or in the name of either one of the parties’ solicitors. The amount in the escrow account would be paid to the seller at the end of the agreed period if there is no claim brought by the buyer.

3. Deferred payment

The parties may agree for the buyer to pay the bulk of the purchase price on completion of the sale and purchase agreement. The buyer would then pay the remaining part of the purchase price post completion. The buyer would make the deferred payment to the seller at the end of the agreed period during which the buyer may claim under the warranty or indemnity clauses.

4. Bank guarantee

The buyer may request for the seller to provide a bank guarantee to guarantee the seller’s performance in the event of warranty or indemnity claims. However, the seller may be reluctant to do so as there is cost involved in providing a bank guarantee.

Whether the seller would agree to any of the above would depend partly on the parties’ bargaining power. The seller may also be concerned that the buyer put forward claims without merit to try to set off the purchase price against the warranty or indemnity claims, if the SPA allows for setting off.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

Originally posted on Linkedin on 5 November 2021.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …