How sellers qualify representations and warranties (R&W) in M&A transactions

Linkedin Post

Sellers usually make R&W in sale and purchase agreements (SPA) with respect to the target business/company being sold.

The R&W serve as assurances to buyers and allocate risks between buyers and sellers.

Sellers typically limit their liabilities in respect of the R&W in the following manner:

1. Use of knowledge qualifier

๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ: ๐˜›๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฎ, ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ.

The knowledge qualifier limits sellersโ€™ liability to only what the sellers know. The sellersโ€™ knowledge may be actual knowledge and may also include constructive knowledge, depending on the partiesโ€™ negotiation on this point.

I once encountered a buyer who agreed to the sellerโ€™s request to qualify every seller’s R&W in the SPA to the best of the sellerโ€™s knowledge. I thought this was a wrong move by the buyer because some R&W were fundamental to the transaction such as the sellerโ€™s title to the sale shares. Itโ€™s in the buyerโ€™s interest not to agree to such fundamental R&W being qualified.

2. Use of materiality threshold

๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ: ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต, ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง [๐˜œ๐˜š๐˜‹100,000].

Sellers may use a materiality threshold in the R&W in SPA so that sellers are responsible only if the breaches of the R&W surpass the threshold.

A materiality threshold helps the parties to distinguish between minor issues that do not significantly affect the business from more significant issues that could have adverse effects. For this to work, the parties need to agree on the materiality and avoid becoming entangled in negotiation over what is material.

3. Use of disclosure letter

A disclosure letter sets out the known issues which amount to inaccuracies or exceptions to the seller’s R&W.

Sellers provide draft disclosure letters for buyersโ€™ review before execution of the SPA. When sellers and buyers are satisfied with the content of the disclosure letters, they will execute the disclosure letters together with the SPA.

By disclosing the exceptions to the R&W in the disclosure letters (which are subject to the buyersโ€™ acceptance), sellers will not be liable for breach of R&W in respect of matters already disclosed in the disclosure letters. It is in the sellers’ interest to disclose the exceptions to the R&W in the disclosure letters with sufficient details for the buyers to assess the issues.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was posted on LinkedIn on 5 January 2024.

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysiaโ€™s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions donโ€™t always mean โ€œno entryโ€ for investors in Malaysia. If youโ€™re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.ย ย ย ย The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholdersโ€™ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholdersโ€™ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …