How sellers qualify representations and warranties (R&W) in M&A transactions

Linkedin Post

Sellers usually make R&W in sale and purchase agreements (SPA) with respect to the target business/company being sold.

The R&W serve as assurances to buyers and allocate risks between buyers and sellers.

Sellers typically limit their liabilities in respect of the R&W in the following manner:

1. Use of knowledge qualifier

๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ: ๐˜›๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฎ, ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ.

The knowledge qualifier limits sellersโ€™ liability to only what the sellers know. The sellersโ€™ knowledge may be actual knowledge and may also include constructive knowledge, depending on the partiesโ€™ negotiation on this point.

I once encountered a buyer who agreed to the sellerโ€™s request to qualify every seller’s R&W in the SPA to the best of the sellerโ€™s knowledge. I thought this was a wrong move by the buyer because some R&W were fundamental to the transaction such as the sellerโ€™s title to the sale shares. Itโ€™s in the buyerโ€™s interest not to agree to such fundamental R&W being qualified.

2. Use of materiality threshold

๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ: ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต, ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง [๐˜œ๐˜š๐˜‹100,000].

Sellers may use a materiality threshold in the R&W in SPA so that sellers are responsible only if the breaches of the R&W surpass the threshold.

A materiality threshold helps the parties to distinguish between minor issues that do not significantly affect the business from more significant issues that could have adverse effects. For this to work, the parties need to agree on the materiality and avoid becoming entangled in negotiation over what is material.

3. Use of disclosure letter

A disclosure letter sets out the known issues which amount to inaccuracies or exceptions to the seller’s R&W.

Sellers provide draft disclosure letters for buyersโ€™ review before execution of the SPA. When sellers and buyers are satisfied with the content of the disclosure letters, they will execute the disclosure letters together with the SPA.

By disclosing the exceptions to the R&W in the disclosure letters (which are subject to the buyersโ€™ acceptance), sellers will not be liable for breach of R&W in respect of matters already disclosed in the disclosure letters. It is in the sellers’ interest to disclose the exceptions to the R&W in the disclosure letters with sufficient details for the buyers to assess the issues.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was posted on LinkedIn on 5 January 2024.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …