How to Draft Clear and Effective Conditions Precedent in M&A Transactions

Drafting

The fulfilment of conditions precedent in an M&A transaction signifies that a sale and purchase agreement has become unconditional and the parties are obliged to complete the transaction. Failure by any party to complete the transaction after conditions precedent are fulfilled usually results in that party being liable to compensate the other party.

Therefore, it makes sense to draft the clauses in relation to conditions precedent clearly.

Key elements include:

1. What needs to be done?

Specify the exact actions or requirements to be fulfilled.

2. Which party is responsible for fulfilling or ensuring the fulfilment of each condition precedent?

3. When must the condition precedents be fulfilled?

4. What is the required standard of fulfilment of a condition precedent?

For example, is a condition precedent relating to obtaining approval from a particular authority fulfilled upon approval granted by the authority regardless of conditions imposed, or only when the authority grants unconditional approval, or only when the authority grants approval with conditions acceptable to both the seller and buyer?

5. What is the required standard of effort the relevant party must apply to satisfy the condition precedent?

Best endeavour is a higher standard than reasonable endeavour.

To avoid disputes, set out the specific actions a relevant party should take to satisfy a particular obligation. For example, specify whether a party must appeal if the approval granted by a particular authority is subject to a condition which is not acceptable to the buyer or seller.

If appropriate, set a limit on the amount of expenditure a party may need to incur in fulfilling a condition precedent.

6. What is required to prove that a condition precedent has been met?

7. What is the timeline for notifying the other party that a condition precedent has been met?

8. What is the consequence of failure to meet a condition precedent?

For points 1 and 2, I prefer using active verbs to passive verbs.

Where there are ambiguities, we may infer from the context, but I much rather everything is worded clearly in the sale and purchase agreement.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was posted on LinkedIn on 16 May 2024.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …