Indirect Substantial Shareholder

Company Law

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company.

One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a company.

Sections 8 and 136 of the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia are the relevant provisions to consider when determining whether someone is an indirect substantial shareholder.

In a straightforward example shown in the diagram, Z is a substantial shareholder in Company X because:

👉 A person is a substantial shareholder in a company if the person has an interest in one or more voting shares in the company and the aggregate number of such shares is not less than 5% of the total number of all the voting shares in the company (s136, Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia).

👉 A person shall be deemed to have an interest in a share where a body corporate has an interest in a share and that person is entitled to exercise or control the exercise of not less than 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in the body corporate (s8(4)(c), Companies Act 2016).

Z is entitled to exercise 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in Company Y, which in turn holds 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X. Therefore, Z is deemed to have an interest in 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X in accordance with s8(4)(c) of the Companies Act 2016. This makes Z a substantial shareholder of Company X under s136.

The issue gets more interesting when additional layers of companies exist between Z and Company X, or when relationships among the shareholders need to be closely examined to determine whether they are associates of each other.

MalaysianCorporateLawyer
SubstantialShareholder
CompaniesAct2016

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 November 2023.

Linkedin Post
Getting into the details to make a deal work

A big part of my role as a corporate lawyer has been listening to clients explain the commercial terms they want in their deals. The next step is asking the right questions that make those terms work in the real world. Sometimes the parties have a general idea of the …

Linkedin Post
Founder Exit: Legal Checklist to Avoid Delays

Before buyers commit, their lawyers will conduct legal due diligence that may uncover gaps or non-compliance which delay the founder’s exit or reduce the price. This list helps founders/ sellers resolve common legal issues before they’re flagged in legal due diligence. Share Capital & Shareholders  Have all past share allotments …

Linkedin Post
Founders selling for the first time need more than high-level legal advice

Some founders selling their businesses for the first time are not sure where legal advice is needed or how deep that advice should go. In past deals where I acted for buyers, I have seen: – A founder who asked their lawyer for a “high-level review” of sale and purchase …