Indirect Substantial Shareholder

Company Law

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company.

One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a company.

Sections 8 and 136 of the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia are the relevant provisions to consider when determining whether someone is an indirect substantial shareholder.

In a straightforward example shown in the diagram, Z is a substantial shareholder in Company X because:

👉 A person is a substantial shareholder in a company if the person has an interest in one or more voting shares in the company and the aggregate number of such shares is not less than 5% of the total number of all the voting shares in the company (s136, Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia).

👉 A person shall be deemed to have an interest in a share where a body corporate has an interest in a share and that person is entitled to exercise or control the exercise of not less than 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in the body corporate (s8(4)(c), Companies Act 2016).

Z is entitled to exercise 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in Company Y, which in turn holds 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X. Therefore, Z is deemed to have an interest in 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X in accordance with s8(4)(c) of the Companies Act 2016. This makes Z a substantial shareholder of Company X under s136.

The issue gets more interesting when additional layers of companies exist between Z and Company X, or when relationships among the shareholders need to be closely examined to determine whether they are associates of each other.

MalaysianCorporateLawyer
SubstantialShareholder
CompaniesAct2016

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 November 2023.

Linkedin Post
Conversation on W&I Insurance in M&A Transactions

As an M&A lawyer with a keen interest in the nuances of the M&A field, I’ve observed that warranty and indemnity insurance (W&I) is not that common in M&A transactions in Malaysia, as far as I know. Therefore, when I saw Martijn de Lange of BMS Group commenting about W&I …

Company Law
Legal Requirements for Directors’ Fees and Benefits in Malaysia

One common issue I encounter in both M&A deals and IPO exercises relates to compliance with the legal requirements for the payment of director’s fees and benefits. Additionally, the legal obligations regarding director’s service contracts should not be overlooked. Here are the key points: Constitution 1. If a company, whether public …

Linkedin Post
M&A: Earn-out vs. Performance Guarantee

I find that clients and other advisers sometimes confuse the concepts of an earn-out with a performance guarantee. They tell me they want a performance guarantee clause in the sale and purchase agreement, but upon further probing, it becomes clear that what they actually want is an earn-out clause. Both …