Indirect Substantial Shareholder

Company Law

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company.

One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a company.

Sections 8 and 136 of the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia are the relevant provisions to consider when determining whether someone is an indirect substantial shareholder.

In a straightforward example shown in the diagram, Z is a substantial shareholder in Company X because:

👉 A person is a substantial shareholder in a company if the person has an interest in one or more voting shares in the company and the aggregate number of such shares is not less than 5% of the total number of all the voting shares in the company (s136, Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia).

👉 A person shall be deemed to have an interest in a share where a body corporate has an interest in a share and that person is entitled to exercise or control the exercise of not less than 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in the body corporate (s8(4)(c), Companies Act 2016).

Z is entitled to exercise 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in Company Y, which in turn holds 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X. Therefore, Z is deemed to have an interest in 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X in accordance with s8(4)(c) of the Companies Act 2016. This makes Z a substantial shareholder of Company X under s136.

The issue gets more interesting when additional layers of companies exist between Z and Company X, or when relationships among the shareholders need to be closely examined to determine whether they are associates of each other.

MalaysianCorporateLawyer
SubstantialShareholder
CompaniesAct2016

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 November 2023.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …