Indirect Substantial Shareholder

Company Law

A person can be a substantial shareholder in a company without directly holding any shares in that company.

One of the challenges that often arises when I work on IPOs or other equity capital market exercises is the assessment of whether an individual holds an indirect substantial shareholding in a company.

Sections 8 and 136 of the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia are the relevant provisions to consider when determining whether someone is an indirect substantial shareholder.

In a straightforward example shown in the diagram, Z is a substantial shareholder in Company X because:

👉 A person is a substantial shareholder in a company if the person has an interest in one or more voting shares in the company and the aggregate number of such shares is not less than 5% of the total number of all the voting shares in the company (s136, Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia).

👉 A person shall be deemed to have an interest in a share where a body corporate has an interest in a share and that person is entitled to exercise or control the exercise of not less than 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in the body corporate (s8(4)(c), Companies Act 2016).

Z is entitled to exercise 20% of the votes attached to the voting shares in Company Y, which in turn holds 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X. Therefore, Z is deemed to have an interest in 5% of the total number of the voting shares in Company X in accordance with s8(4)(c) of the Companies Act 2016. This makes Z a substantial shareholder of Company X under s136.

The issue gets more interesting when additional layers of companies exist between Z and Company X, or when relationships among the shareholders need to be closely examined to determine whether they are associates of each other.

MalaysianCorporateLawyer
SubstantialShareholder
CompaniesAct2016

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 November 2023.

17 Years in Private Practice
Lawyering
17 Years in Legal Practice

17 years. That is how long I have been in the legal profession. Over the years, there have been many transactions done and dusted, and many people I worked with on those transactions have since moved on to other paths. There are not many people I can turn to and …

Linkedin Post
Peak Period: A Moving Target for Corporate Lawyers

“When is your peak period?” I was asked. “Whenever the client wants the deal to go fast” I replied. The workload of corporate lawyers is not seasonal. It’s client-driven. The pace follows transaction timelines and clients’ expectations. What looks like a quiet period can quickly turn into full momentum overnight …

Linkedin Post
Partial Share Sales in Malaysia: What Sellers Need to Know About Guarantees

In partial disposals, it’s common for sellers and buyers to agree that any existing guarantees given by the sellers to secure banking facilities of the target companies will be adjusted to reflect the post-completion shareholding. For public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, this can affect the deal timeline if not …