Integrity in pricing

Lawyering

I attempted to negotiate a discount with my dentist only to be met with a firm response regarding their fixed price. The justification given was that the clinic had incurred expenses in acquiring equipment to enhance services provided and it’s the same price for everyone for the same services.

I didn’t try too hard to get a discount because I empathized with the dentist.

On the contrary, I respected the dentist because he was firm with his fees.

The price and the services provided did not depend on how hard or how well I bargained for a discount.

The dentist’s refusal to give discount gave me the assurance that I had not overpaid or being short-changed in respect of the services provided compared to others.

I think of this as integrity in pricing.

Similarly, in the legal profession, rather than basing fees on how hard a client negotiates to reduce the fees or how deep the client’s pocket is, pricing should be based on factors such as the scope of services provided, urgency of the matter and complexities of the issues.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

This post first posted on LinkedIn on 6 June 2024.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …