Lawyering

Lawyering

I sighed inwardly when I was greeted with three forms to fill when I attended my dental appointment.

There was a form to fill in personal data, a privacy consent form and a questionnaire about medical history.

The last form was a two-page questionnaire with ‘answer yes/no’ questions squeezed into three columns on each side of the page.

I groaned. This must be how the clients feel when they fill in legal due diligence questionnaire.

Next, the dentist ran through the questionnaire with me. I think he asked the same questions but in different manner three times. Perhaps he was trying to get certain information but the nuances of the questions were lost on me.

Perhaps I was just impatient. It was a beautiful Saturday morning. I had deadlines to meet the following week and I was anxious to get back to my work. I was tempted to skip the dental appointment if not for the fact that I had to wait a month for the appointment.

My thinking changed as the dentist went through the questions meticulously. There was no doubt that he was thorough. This is the first time I encountered a dentist who measured my blood pressure. He ran through what he called his ‘independent tests’ and gave me a clear explanation on what to expect. He also told me that I would thank him later for being so thorough. He wasn’t trying to sell me anything. I am not an expert in this area but I could sense that he is a professional doing his job properly.

In my line of work, sometimes the management of the target “complain” when we ask questions to clarify legal due diligence issues. When we have doubts, we ask questions. When the answers are not clear, we ask more questions to clarify. We then analyse and discuss the issues with the clients to decide on their importance and whether to address those issues in the transaction agreements. We could have done the minimum required but that’s not how we work.

I appreciated the dentist’s effort more than I would have otherwise because of what I have gone through in my profession.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 3 November 2022.

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysia’s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions don’t always mean “no entry” for investors in Malaysia. If you’re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.    The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholders’ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholders’ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …