Lawyering

Lawyering

I sighed inwardly when I was greeted with three forms to fill when I attended my dental appointment.

There was a form to fill in personal data, a privacy consent form and a questionnaire about medical history.

The last form was a two-page questionnaire with ‘answer yes/no’ questions squeezed into three columns on each side of the page.

I groaned. This must be how the clients feel when they fill in legal due diligence questionnaire.

Next, the dentist ran through the questionnaire with me. I think he asked the same questions but in different manner three times. Perhaps he was trying to get certain information but the nuances of the questions were lost on me.

Perhaps I was just impatient. It was a beautiful Saturday morning. I had deadlines to meet the following week and I was anxious to get back to my work. I was tempted to skip the dental appointment if not for the fact that I had to wait a month for the appointment.

My thinking changed as the dentist went through the questions meticulously. There was no doubt that he was thorough. This is the first time I encountered a dentist who measured my blood pressure. He ran through what he called his ‘independent tests’ and gave me a clear explanation on what to expect. He also told me that I would thank him later for being so thorough. He wasn’t trying to sell me anything. I am not an expert in this area but I could sense that he is a professional doing his job properly.

In my line of work, sometimes the management of the target “complain” when we ask questions to clarify legal due diligence issues. When we have doubts, we ask questions. When the answers are not clear, we ask more questions to clarify. We then analyse and discuss the issues with the clients to decide on their importance and whether to address those issues in the transaction agreements. We could have done the minimum required but that’s not how we work.

I appreciated the dentist’s effort more than I would have otherwise because of what I have gone through in my profession.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 3 November 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-Out: A Postponed Dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The Disclosure Letter: Why Founders Selling Their Companies Should Not Treat It as an Afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-Party Consents in a Share Sale: What Sellers Should Check Before Negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …