M&A: Certainty of terms

Drafting

It drives me a bit crazy sometimes when parties to transaction agreements request for ambiguous provisions to be included into agreements.

By that I mean provisions which beg one or a combination of the following questions:

-What needs to be done to achieve the desired result?
-Who is responsible?
-How is it going to be done?
-When the obligations need to be done?
-What happens if the objective is not achieved?

“We want to keep things open.”
“We don’t have visibility yet.”
“But we still want to say something about it.”
These are the usual reasons given for wanting to include ambiguous provisions in contracts.

It goes against our nature or training as lawyers to purposely draft something vague. We have been taught that in order to create a binding contract, the terms must be sufficiently certain for the courts to enforce. Lawyers are trained to draft as clearly as possible.

But law schools have not taught us what to do if the contracting parties want to keep the terms vague.

Sometimes vague clauses are included for what I think as “placebo effect” and appear to be harmless. Having those clauses in the agreements make the parties feel better about their relationship with each other although legally, the clauses do not seem to achieve anything.

However, some clauses are just too important to be left open for interpretation.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 7 October 2022.

Linkedin Post
M&A: What you need to consider for sale and purchase agreement

Before diving headlong into drafting the sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction, take some time to understand the business of the target company and the regulatory framework in which it operates. Consider the following: 1. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀: What are the business activities of the target company? What products or …

Linkedin Post
Five key steps for legal due diligence

Most lawyers are good at identifying issues, but legal due diligence shouldn’t be limited to merely reviewing documents and identifying issues. Here are my five steps for conducting legal due diligence: 1. Identify the issues based on the scope of legal due diligence as agreed with the clients. 2. Provide recommendations …

Linkedin Post
Begin with the end in mind: Post-completion integration

I once worked on an M&A deal that took more than a year to complete. While the deal was not inherently complex, it dragged on due to delays in finalizing the details of the transaction agreements for reason beyond my control. As the deal involved a larger corporation acquiring a …