M&A: Material adverse change (MAC)

Linkedin Post

MAC clauses are contractual provisions which allow a buyer to walk away from a deal between signing and completion of the SPA upon the occurrence of material events which adversely affect the target company or business.

MAC clauses are intended to provide for unforeseen circumstances which have an adverse effect on the target.

Whether to include a MAC clause in a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) is a matter of negotiation.

From the buyer’s perspective, having a wide definition of what constitutes MAC is beneficial whereas the seller would want to limit the MAC clause to specific events or have wide exceptions to MAC events.
MAC clauses may provide for events such as major disruption to supply chain, loss of long-term customers or major customers or a litigation against the target.

Points to consider for MAC clauses:

1. To provide certainty as to what constitutes MAC, specify a quantitative level of financial or operational impact which an event may have on the target in order for the event to constitute MAC.

2. A SPA may provide for a MAC clause as a condition precedent or warranty.

If the SPA provides for a MAC clause as a condition precedent and a MAC happens during the conditional period (before completion), the condition precedent is not fulfilled. The buyer is then entitled to walk away from the deal.

Alternatively, the SPA may provide for a MAC clause by including a warranty that since a specified date (usually the date of the last audited accounts of the target company), there has not been any material adverse change in the business, financial position or profits of the target. If the warranty is not true when repeated at completion, the buyer may walk away from the deal.

3. If the buyer relies on third party financing for the deal and the financing is subject to a MAC condition, that condition should be reflected in the terms of the SPA.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions
#Materialadversechange

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 3 February 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …