M&A Specialist and Generalist

Linkedin Post

I didn’t fully appreciate how specialised and broad M&A practice is until I found myself thinking about how various legal issues discussed in the articles I read apply to M&A transactions.

While reading an article on whether consideration is required for the variation of contracts, I was reminded of a document I came across during legal due diligence. Although it was not labelled as a contract, it appeared to fulfill the requirements of a contract and varied another contract.

M&A is a specialised practice that requires a solid grasp of concepts used in M&A transactions, such as completion accounts, locked box mechanisms, earnouts and adjustment mechanisms.

At the same time, legal due diligence on target companies in M&A transactions requires a broad understanding of various areas of law. The following are some of the key areas of law and related issues that often arise during due diligence:

1. Companies Act 2016

  • Are shares properly allotted and transferred?
  • Have the target companies complied with legal requirements for filing annual returns and financial statements?
  • Is there any breach related to financial assistance or the prohibition of loans to directors

2. Contracts Act 1950

Are any employment contracts in breach of section 28 (restraint of trade)?

3. Employment Laws

Are the employment contracts and policies of the target companies compliant with employment laws?

Consider post-acquisition litigation risks.

4. Personal Data Protection Laws

Do the privacy notices of the target companies comply with the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 and related regulations?

A breach in personal data protection laws could be a red flag for reputational or regulatory risk.

5. Stamp Act 1949

Has stamp duty been paid on agreements entered by the target companies?

Even a small oversight could lead to costly penalties.

M&A is an intellectually stimulating and demanding practice area. It requires a deep understanding of transaction nuances, which may vary depending on whether the lawyer is acting for the seller or purchaser, as well as an understanding of the interplay of laws across a wide range of fields.

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 2 March 2025.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …