M&A Tip: Why Sellers Should Provide Share Ownership Documents (Not Just the CCM Search)

Due Diligence

One of the biggest sources of delay in Malaysian M&A due diligence is surprisingly simple:

Sellers often provide a company search from the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM) when what lawyers really need are the statutory share documents.

A lawyer conducting proper due diligence will typically request documents such as:

  •  Shareholders’ resolution approving the allotment of shares
  • Directors’ resolution for allotment of shares
  • Return of allotment of shares
  • Stamped share transfer forms
  • Register of members
  • Register of transfers

These statutory documents are required to verify:

1. ownership of the shares
2. whether the shares were properly allotted and transferred under the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia.

This is why a CCM search falls short:

  • Under the Companies Act 2016, the entry of a person’s name in the register of members as shareholder is prima facie evidence that legal title to the share is vested in that person.
  • The Companies Act prohibits directors from allotting shares without prior shareholders’ approval. Any issue of shares made in contravention of this requirement shall be void and consideration given for the shares shall be recoverable accordingly.
  •  The recent Federal Court decision in 𝘞𝘛𝘒 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺 𝘚𝘥𝘯 𝘉𝘩𝘥 𝘷 𝘒𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘺𝘯 𝘔𝘢 𝘞𝘢𝘪 𝘍𝘰𝘯𝘨 & 𝘈𝘯𝘰𝘳 & 𝘖𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘴 confirms that a court order is required for validation of shares that were not properly allotted, rather than relying on informal shareholder assent.

However, many sellers provide only a CCM search believing that if their names appear on the CCM search, it is sufficient.

This often leads to unnecessary rounds of back-and-forth, a problem that is amplified in deals where the due diligence team interacts with sellers only through intermediaries. Deals slow down. Timelines lengthen. Everyone gets frustrated.

The Takeaway

If sellers want due diligence and the deal to move quickly, the solution is simple:

Provide the share ownership documents upfront, not just the CCM search.

I share insights like this to help clients and counsels navigate Malaysian M&A with clarity.

If you’re dealing with cross-border transactions or preparing for a sale or acquisition, always happy to connect.

#MalaysianCorporateLawyer

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 16 November 2025.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …