Minority shareholders, is failure to secure a board seat always a loss?

Directors

I used to think board observer rights were simply a compromise for minority shareholders who do not have enough bargaining power to secure a board seat.

I recently came across a perspective that changed my mind.

For some investors with interests across various portfolio companies, board observer rights may actually be a better commercial fit than having the right to appoint a director.

A board seat gives a certain degree of control, but it also comes with:
·      fiduciary duties
·      governance responsibilities
·      potential conflicts of interest.

A board seat remains valuable when control is the objective.

For minority shareholders who want visibility into the business without taking on the same level of responsibility or exposure, observer rights may sometimes be sufficient.

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 May 2026.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …