Post-completion integration in M&A: Key considerations

Linkedin Post

Ever had an M&A deal stretch over a year due to integration issues? I learned a few lessons from such an experience.

Despite the simplicity of the transaction, negotiations were protracted, driven by approvals needed from various departments within the corporate buyer. The acquisition involved a larger corporation acquiring a stake in a smaller company. Although integration was discussed several times, no consensus was achieved. When parties finally addressed cost allocation and other integration aspects, they realised that their expectations are not aligned. This led to additional months of negotiation to finalise the sale and purchase agreement.

In M&A transactions, it’s crucial to consider post-completion integration early in the process. Key considerations include:

  • Transitional Services: Will the seller provide services such as HR, payroll, or IT to the target until full integration of the target into the corporate buyer’s group of companies?
  • Shared Services: Will the buyer or its group provide shared services to the target for efficiency and alignment with the buyer’s operations?
  • Cost Allocation: How will costs be allocated between the parties?
  • Agreements: Are separate agreements needed for transitional or shared services? Some parties include these in the main sale and purchase agreement to lock in terms.
  • Profitability Impact: If the target is charged for shared services, how will this affect its profitability and any earnout provisions for the seller?

Considering these aspects early can save time and ensure a smoother transition for all parties involved.

Do you have any stories to share about post-completion integration in M&A deals?

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post first posted on LinkedIn on 1 August 2024.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …