Regulatory requirements for M&A in Malaysia

Lawyering

I find one of the most challenging aspects of an M&A transaction in Malaysia is the regulatory regime in which the target company operates.

If the target company requires certain licences for its operations or operates within a regulated industry, the M&A process must take into account the relevant regulatory requirements. This may involve getting the approval from the relevant regulatory bodies or notifying them of the changes in shareholders, directors or management.

The regulatory requirements may be confusing due to the complicated interplay of regulations, governmental policies, guidelines and directives pertaining to the industry in which the target company is operating. The challenge is exacerbated as some governmental policies are not rendered in writing, and some guidelines or directives may not be accessible by the public.

It is also common for companies to hold licences that may not reflect the latest governmental policies. For example, the shareholding structure of those companies may not reflect the latest equity conditions if an application for a new licence is made at the time of the M&A transaction. This will present difficulties in an M&A transaction that may require regulatory approval due to the proposed share transfer.

Therefore, it is prudent to contact regulators to ascertain the latest policy positions. Where applicable, confirm with the regulators the procedures for obtaining their consent or notifying them for the proposed share transfer or change of directors or management of the target companies.

#MalaysianCorporateLawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 15 February 2024.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …