Shareholders’ Agreement: Getting It Legally Right

Linkedin Post

A shareholders’ agreement is an essential agreement in M&A transactions involving more than one shareholder.

Understanding the key legal provisions is the foundation for a solid shareholders’ agreement. The following are three legal provisions to keep in mind:

1. Quorum for general meeting (Section 328, Companies Act 2016 (“CA”))

Other than in the case of a company with only one shareholder, two shareholders personally present at a general meeting or by proxy shall constitute a quorum unless a higher number is specified in the constitution.

Implication:

In the case of a company with two shareholders, one absent shareholder can prevent the meeting from proceeding, as quorum cannot be met. In such instances, the majority shareholder has to rely on written resolutions to pass resolutions (save for reserved matters agreed between the two shareholders and the matters set out in item 2 below).

2. Removal of director or auditor (Section 297(2), CA)

A resolution to remove a director or auditor before expiration of his term of office cannot be passed as a written resolution and requires a physical general meeting instead.

Implication:

This requirement makes it more difficult to remove a director or auditor before the expiration of his term of office.

3. Venue for meetings (Section 327, CA)

The main venue for meeting of shareholders must be in Malaysia and the chairperson must be present at that main venue.

Implication:

This may pose a problem for companies with non-resident shareholders. They may have to pass resolutions by way of written resolutions instead (save for the matters set out in item 2 above).

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#shareholdersagreement

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 14 January 2025.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …