Shareholders’ prior approval required for allotment of shares

Company Law

The consequence of not getting shareholders’ prior approval for allotment of shares (if the approval is required under the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia) could be severe.

Therefore, if the scope of due diligence for an M&A transaction includes verifying shares in the target company have been duly allotted, the verification should include whether shareholders’ prior approval has been obtained for directors to exercise their power to allot those shares.

The directors of a company are prohibited under section 75(1) of the Companies Act 2016 from exercising their power to allot shares in the company unless shareholders’ prior approval by way of resolution has been obtained.

Any issuance of shares without shareholders’ prior approval in contravention of section 75 is void and consideration given for the shares is recoverable.

A director of the company who permits the contravention of or fails to take all reasonable steps to prevent the contravention of section 75 with respect to any issue of shares commits an offence.

The director is liable to compensate the company and the person to whom the shares were issued for any loss, damages, or costs which the company or that person may have incurred.

The limitation period to commence proceedings to recover any such loss, damages or costs is 3 years from the date of issue of the shares.

There are exceptions under section 75(2) to the requirement to get shareholders’ prior approval for allotment of shares. The exceptions include:

(1) rights issue or bonus issue of shares to the shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings;

(2) allotment of shares to a promoter of the company which the promoter has agreed to take; or

(3) shares which are to be issued as consideration for the acquisition of shares or assets by the company and shareholders of the company have been notified of the intention to issue shares at least 14 days before the date of issue of the shares.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions
#companiesact2016

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 18 April 2022.

Linkedin Post
Five key steps for legal due diligence

Most lawyers are good at identifying issues, but legal due diligence shouldn’t be limited to merely reviewing documents and identifying issues. Here are my five steps for conducting legal due diligence: 1. Identify the issues based on the scope of legal due diligence as agreed with the clients. 2. Provide recommendations …

Linkedin Post
Begin with the end in mind: Post-completion integration

I once worked on an M&A deal that took more than a year to complete. While the deal was not inherently complex, it dragged on due to delays in finalizing the details of the transaction agreements for reason beyond my control. As the deal involved a larger corporation acquiring a …

Lawyering
Being a Corporate Lawyer: Why I Do What I Do

After years of demanding schedule and juggling simultaneous corporate exercises which take a toll on physical and mental health, it is not surprising that some corporate lawyers experience burnout. Unlike some legal practice areas, the work of a corporate lawyer may not seem immediately impactful or “make a difference” to …