Spotting inconsistencies in legal due diligence

Due Diligence

Part of legal due diligence includes spotting inconsistencies in the information provided for legal due diligence.

***
For example, the representative of the target company replied that the company does not have any employee in response to questions in the due diligence questionnaire about employment.

However, there is information about salaries and wages paid by the company in its audited accounts.

***
The representative of the target company said it does not have any assets.

But the audited accounts show the company has plant, machinery and equipment.

***
The representative of the target company confirmed that the company has maintained all statutory registers and records of resolutions in accordance with the applicable laws.

But the registers are not up-to-date or there are missing resolutions in relation to circulation of audited financial statements of the company to its shareholders, which should be in place for every financial year.

***
There may be good explanation as to why there are inconsistencies in the information provided.

It is important to identify the inconsistencies and ask follow-up questions to clarify as part of the legal due diligence exercise.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#legalduediligence

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 13 May 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …