Three simple ways to enhance legal due diligence skills

Due Diligence

1. Understand the scope of legal due diligence and work backward to establish what needs to be verified or reviewed. Sometimes, clients may decide on the scope of legal due diligence. For corporate exercises which require regulators’ approvals, the scope of legal due diligence must meet the requirements under the relevant guidelines such as the Prospectus Guidelines in the case of IPO.

For example, if the scope of legal due diligence is to verify all shares in the target company have been duly allotted, the due diligence steps should include reviewing the following documents:

• shareholders’ and directors’ resolutions passed for allotment of shares under sections 75 and 76 of the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia.

• notice of shareholders’ approval for allotment of shares which should be lodged with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days from the date of the shareholders’ approval (section 76(2) of the Companies Act 2016).

• return of allotment which should be lodged with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days from the date of allotment (s78(1) of the Companies Act 2016).

• register of members which should be updated to register the allotment of shares within 14 days from the date of the allotment (section 77(1) of the Companies Act 2016).

• notification to the Registrar of Companies of the changes in the particulars in the register of members within 14 days from the date of the changes (section 51(1) of the Companies Act 2016).

2. Identify the issues based on the scope of legal due diligence and provide solutions for the issues. The solutions could be in the form of obtaining indemnity, appropriate representations and warranties, or certain undertakings from the sellers (in the case of M&A transactions).

3. Always keep in mind the purpose of the legal due diligence exercise.

For example, the purpose of conducting due diligence for an M&A transaction is to identify issues in the target company which may affect the transaction or influence the purchaser’s decision to acquire the target company. Therefore, when reviewing agreements entered by the target company, look out for change in control provisions. In addition, look out for terms which are onerous on the target company such as clauses which require the target company to bear liquidated damages or uncapped liability. These clauses may affect the value of the target company and the purchaser’s investment in the target company.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#legalduediligence
#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 22 April 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-Out: A Postponed Dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The Disclosure Letter: Why Founders Selling Their Companies Should Not Treat It as an Afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-Party Consents in a Share Sale: What Sellers Should Check Before Negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …