Use precedents wisely

Drafting

Precedents are great.

Lawyers don’t have to reinvent the wheel each time we draft legal documents when we have precedents.

However, it doesn’t mean that we can just change the parties’ names and the signing pages for agreements when we use precedents.

It doesn’t mean merely cutting and pasting clauses into documents.

Using precedents correctly and intelligently is a skill.

Consider these when using precedents:

1. Understand the specific purpose of the document you are drafting

You want to draft a share sale and purchase agreement (SPA).

That’s not specific enough.

You want to draft a SPA for a 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘺𝘦𝘳 who is acquiring a 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 stake in a 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 company, which leads us to the next point.

2. Understand the nuances and choose the right precedent

For example, when drafting SPA for M&A transactions, there are different issues to consider for the following:
• whether the parties are corporations or individuals
• single seller versus multiple sellers
• whether the sellers are related to each other
• whether the sale and purchase is for all or part of the issued share capital of the company
• whether the buyer is acquiring a majority or minority stake

The seller’s representations and warranties in relation to the operation of business of a logistics company would be different from that of an e-commerce company.

3. Look out for inconsistencies when referring to various precedents

Don’t exclude liabilities for indirect, consequential and economic loss in Clause 11 only to reinclude those losses in Clause 12 by providing that the aggregate liability of the parties (including all indirect, consequential and economic loss) is limited to $XXX.

Don’t define liens, mortgages, pledges, etc. as “Encumbrances” in the definition clause and then refer to them as “Security Interest” throughout the agreement.

4. Avoid duplications when referring to various precedents.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#drafting

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 25 March 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …