Voting rights of non-voting shares (preference shares)

Company Law

Under the Companies Act 2016, β€œpreference share” means a share by whatever name called, π’˜π’‰π’Šπ’„π’‰ 𝒅𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 π’†π’π’•π’Šπ’•π’π’† 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 π’“π’Šπ’ˆπ’‰π’• 𝒕𝒐 𝒗𝒐𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 π’“π’†π’”π’π’π’–π’•π’Šπ’π’ or to any right to participate beyond a specified amount in any distribution whether by way of dividend, or on redemption, in a winding up, or otherwise.

Section 90(4) of the Companies Act 2016 provides that the constitution of a company must set out the rights of preference shareholders with respect to repayment of capital, participation in surplus assets and profits, cumulative or non-cumulative dividends, π’—π’π’•π’Šπ’π’ˆ and priority of payment of capital and dividend in relation to other shares or other classes of preference shares.

Notwithstanding the definition of β€œpreference share”, preference shareholders may have limited voting rights.

The Companies Commission of Malaysia has clarified in its FAQ that preference shares may carry certain voting rights which must be specified in the constitution of the company. Preference shareholders may be able to vote on matters relating to their respective class of shares provided that such rights are stated in the constitution as required under subsection 90(4) of the Companies Act 2016. The Companies Act 2016 has generally retained the policy on the rights to vote for preference shareholders from the Companies Act 1965 (Repealed).

Preference shareholders may have the following voting rights if the rights are stated in the constitution of a company:

β€’ when preferential dividend was in arrears and unpaid

β€’ on resolution which varies the rights attached to preference shares

β€’ on resolution for winding up of the company.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#preferenceshares

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 4 August 2022.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …