What to consider before appointing a director?

Directors

Prior to appointing a person as a director, check to ensure the person:

1. is at least 18 years old;

2. is not an undischarged bankrupt, who has not obtained leave of the Official Receiver or Court to be appointed as a director;

3. has not been convicted of an offence relating to the promotion, formation or management of a corporation;

4. has not been convicted of an offence involving bribery, fraud or dishonesty;

5. has not been convicted of an offence under s 213 (duties and responsibilities of directors), s 217 (responsibility of nominee director), s 218 (prohibition against improper use of property and position as a director), s 228 (transactions with directors, substantial shareholders or connected persons) and s 539 (liability where proper accounts not kept) of the Companies Act 2016; and

6. has not been disqualified by the Court from acting as a director under s 199 of the Companies Act 2016.

The events which disqualify a person from being a director as set out in items 3 to 6 above apply within 5 years from the date of conviction or if sentenced to imprisonment, from the date of release from prison.

In addition to the above, Bursa Listing Requirements provides that a person must not act as a director of a public company listed on Bursa if the person:

(a) has been convicted by the Court of an offence, involving bribery, fraud or dishonesty or where the conviction involved a finding that he acted fraudulently or dishonestly; or

(b) has been convicted by the Court of an offence under the securities laws or the corporations laws of the PLC’s place of incorporation,

within 5 years from the date of conviction or if sentenced to imprisonment, from the date of release from prison.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#directors
#directordisqualification

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 24 September 2021.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …