Who should be parties to the agreement?

Mergers and acquisitions
Contracts

I occasionally come across the following oversight in shareholders’ agreements and joint venture agreements.

Scenario 1

The cover page and signing page of the agreement state that the parties to the agreement are Party A and Party B only. However, the recital states Party A, Party B and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement) have entered into the agreement. There are also provisions in the agreement which grants rights and imposes obligations on the company.

Scenario 2

The agreement states that the parties to the agreement are Party X, Party Y and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement). However, the agreement does not grant any rights or impose any obligations on the company.

In the agreements above, questions arise as to whether the subject matter company is/should be a party to the agreement.

If the intention is to grant rights and impose obligations on the subject matter company, it should be included as a party to the agreement. This should also be reflected on the cover page and signing page.

Otherwise, there is no need to include the subject matter company as a party to the shareholders’ agreement or joint venture agreement.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#contractdrafting

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 17 January 2021.

Linkedin Post
M&A: What you need to consider for sale and purchase agreement

Before diving headlong into drafting the sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction, take some time to understand the business of the target company and the regulatory framework in which it operates. Consider the following: 1. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀: What are the business activities of the target company? What products or …

Linkedin Post
Five key steps for legal due diligence

Most lawyers are good at identifying issues, but legal due diligence shouldn’t be limited to merely reviewing documents and identifying issues. Here are my five steps for conducting legal due diligence: 1. Identify the issues based on the scope of legal due diligence as agreed with the clients. 2. Provide recommendations …

Linkedin Post
Begin with the end in mind: Post-completion integration

I once worked on an M&A deal that took more than a year to complete. While the deal was not inherently complex, it dragged on due to delays in finalizing the details of the transaction agreements for reason beyond my control. As the deal involved a larger corporation acquiring a …