Buyer beware: How to address issues on assets or company

Article

Let the buyer beware  

Under the law, there is a principle known as “let the buyer beware” or “caveat emptor” which generally means that buyer purchases at the buyer’s own risk. The principle places the onus on the buyer to conduct due diligence before making a purchase. 

A prudent buyer typically carries out due diligence on the assets or the company in respect of the shares which the buyer intends to acquire, prior to the acquisition. The scope of due diligence may depend on the buyer’s budget, risk tolerance, value of the transaction and nature of the industry in which the target asset or target company is in. 

A buyer may discover in the course of due diligence that there are issues with the assets or shares which the buyer intends to acquire, such as regulatory approvals required to carry out the business are not in order, non-compliance of conditions of licences or breach of terms of contracts. 

Some possible solutions 

The buyer may consider the following to rectify the issues or mitigate the risk: 

  1. The sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to provide for the issues to be rectified before the SPA becomes unconditional. 
  2. The SPA to provide for the issues to be rectified before the transaction is completed i.e. before the assets or shares are transferred to the buyer and consideration paid to the seller. 
  3. The seller to agree in the SPA to indemnify the buyer if the risk materialises such as fines imposed by regulator for non-compliance.
  4. The buyer to retain part of the consideration after completion of the transaction and pay the retained sum only after the issues are rectified within an agreed period. 

The nature and severity of the issues and the time required for rectification are factors to be considered in deciding how to rectify the issues or mitigate the risk. 

The information in this article is intended only to provide general information and does not constitute legal opinion or professional advice.  

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …

Linkedin Post
Declining Sales: Must the Seller Tell the Buyer in an M&A Deal?

A seller signed a share sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to sell shares in two companies. Before completion of the SPA, he found out that sales to two of the companies’ major customers were declining. Should he inform the buyer, or not? He chose not to inform the buyer. In …