Exclusivity when negotiating an M&A deal

Linkedin Post

If you are a buyer negotiating to acquire business or shares of a company, you would want to ensure that you do not incur costs during the negotiation only for the seller to end the negotiation and sell to another party.

A buyer would want to ensure that the seller is not using the buyer to attract higher offers.

Therefore, the buyer would usually want to include an exclusivity clause in the term sheet or heads of agreement (HoA). This clause ensures that the seller agrees not to engage in negotiations with other parties during an agreed period, allowing the buyer to negotiate exclusively with the seller.

If other terms in the term sheet or HoA are meant to be non-binding, it is important to specifically state that the exclusivity clause is binding. The parties should also specify clearly when the exclusivity period will end. Without clear wording, there may be disputes about the enforceability of the exclusivity clause. Furthermore, from the buyer’s perspective, it’s beneficial to include “break fees” or other compensatory terms in the event the seller violates the exclusivity clause. This adds an extra layer of protection for the buyer.

From the seller’s perspective, the seller would want the exclusivity period to be as short as possible to avoid being restricted if there are other potential buyers.

In short:

  1. Include an exclusivity clause in term sheet or HoA.
  2. State that the exclusivity clause is binding.
  3. Specify when the exclusivity period will end.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 14 February 2025.

Linkedin Post
Getting into the details to make a deal work

A big part of my role as a corporate lawyer has been listening to clients explain the commercial terms they want in their deals. The next step is asking the right questions that make those terms work in the real world. Sometimes the parties have a general idea of the …

Linkedin Post
Founder Exit: Legal Checklist to Avoid Delays

Before buyers commit, their lawyers will conduct legal due diligence that may uncover gaps or non-compliance which delay the founder’s exit or reduce the price. This list helps founders/ sellers resolve common legal issues before they’re flagged in legal due diligence. Share Capital & Shareholders  Have all past share allotments …

Linkedin Post
Founders selling for the first time need more than high-level legal advice

Some founders selling their businesses for the first time are not sure where legal advice is needed or how deep that advice should go. In past deals where I acted for buyers, I have seen: – A founder who asked their lawyer for a “high-level review” of sale and purchase …