Representations and warranties seller should avoid

Linkedin Post

Today’s post is on some of the representations and warranties a seller should avoid giving in a M&A transaction.

1. Representations and warranties about the future
The seller should avoid providing representations and warranties in respect of future events if there is uncertainty about the future. Further, after the seller disposes of the seller’s shares, the seller may no longer be in control of the target company and hence, not in a position to ensure the representations and warranties continue to be true.

Example:
The Company has not supplied services which are, or were, or will become, in any material respect, faulty or defective.

2. Representations and warranties on matters which are not within the seller’s control

Example:
No other party to any contract to which the Company is a party is unlikely or unwilling or unable to fulfil its contractual obligations.

3. Widely drafted representations and warranties
Without definitive parameters, the seller may be caught off guard by breach of representations and warranties which the seller has not contemplated.

Example:
The statutory books and books of account and other records of whatsoever kind of the Company are up-to-date and maintained in accordance with all applicable legal requirements.

The list above is not exhaustive and may differ depending on the facts of the circumstances.

What would you add to the list?

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

Originally posted on Linkedin on  8 November 2021.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …