Representations and warranties seller should avoid

Linkedin Post

Today’s post is on some of the representations and warranties a seller should avoid giving in a M&A transaction.

1. Representations and warranties about the future
The seller should avoid providing representations and warranties in respect of future events if there is uncertainty about the future. Further, after the seller disposes of the seller’s shares, the seller may no longer be in control of the target company and hence, not in a position to ensure the representations and warranties continue to be true.

Example:
The Company has not supplied services which are, or were, or will become, in any material respect, faulty or defective.

2. Representations and warranties on matters which are not within the seller’s control

Example:
No other party to any contract to which the Company is a party is unlikely or unwilling or unable to fulfil its contractual obligations.

3. Widely drafted representations and warranties
Without definitive parameters, the seller may be caught off guard by breach of representations and warranties which the seller has not contemplated.

Example:
The statutory books and books of account and other records of whatsoever kind of the Company are up-to-date and maintained in accordance with all applicable legal requirements.

The list above is not exhaustive and may differ depending on the facts of the circumstances.

What would you add to the list?

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#mergersandacquisitions

Originally posted on Linkedin on  8 November 2021.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …